Live Action Cartoon Network=BAD Idea!

I loathe the idea that the Cartoon Network has moved into the live action arena. It was bad enough when they started showing live action movies and even crappy variety-style shows but now they’re moving into the Sci-Fi (oops..meant Scy-Fy) Channel arena of terrible original movie concepts.

Quote:
Cartoon Network sets up King Arthur movie
Live-action movie described as modern retelling of tale

By Nellie Andreeva

April 15, 2009, 11:00 PM ET
Cartoon Network is bringing the legend of King Arthur to the 21st century with a live-action movie from Lionsgate president of motion picture production Alli Shearmur.

Written by Travis Wright ("Eagle Eye"), the project, tentatively titled "Reborn," is inspired by the legend of Merlin. It is described as a modern retelling of the King Arthur tale, with archetypal characters from the legend transported to the present.

Does the world really need yet another bad re-imagination of the King Arthur myth? I doubt it.

Are the ratings that much better for live action? I realize live action is cheaper and faster to produce than animation but a zillion channels already do shoddy sf/f live action. What about the shoddy original animated films? They need love, too.

I really like the idea of a network that shows nothing but cartoons.

What’s next? Comedy Central to air Sopranos?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *